Concluding our views on the criminal conspiracy targeting Operation Grange - about which nobody except the Bureau is bothered. The available evidence is laid out here:
https://blacksmithbureau.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/successful-conspiracy.html
Used - the earliest "opposition" victims
Its Actions
- The small group behind the conspiracy invents important Grange suspects and plants them in convincing tabloid media stories (packages). All of the “important suspects” are fakes and most have never existed at all.
- The planted, fake stories, all pretending to be written by journalists on the various tabloids they appear in, give an impression of buffoonish incompetence by Grange – picking, chasing and losing suspects, following false leads, never producing results, always promising arrests soon.
Used back in 2007 - the foulmouthed victim, Tony Parsons
Its Aims
- In the four years that the conspiracy has been in operation its underlying message – the conclusions they want you to draw from the fake facts – has progressively strengthened. It has always concealed its motives but at first it also concealed its intentions.
- So for a couple of years it pretended to be in favour of Grange, even though its claims were always detrimental to the real investigation. As time has passed, though, the message that Grange is a failure that should be denied further funds and scrapped has become stronger and stronger.
Used - the nanny hating victim
Entering Desperate Times
With the latest stories the attack has intensified to desperate levels and the mainstream press has once again been corrupted not just into carrying the plants - unwise but perhaps forgivable in this hard world - but adopting them and suggesting to the public they are true. That is deception.It is what happened in early 2007. Then, for example, the MSM all carried claims fed to them via friends, contacts and family of the McCanns that the apartment 5A “shutters had been damaged” or “jemmied” – inventions that the claimants have never repeated since.
But it was only as the affair progressed that the MSM adopted the line that the McCann family were truthful witnesses of what happened, meaning that they were telling the public the jemmied claims and other lies weren't lies at all. That was the beginning of the MSM's descent into disguising paid-for opinion derived from hidden sources as factual news: deception. Exactly the same deception as Piers Morgan allowed at the Mirror to make himself money from share deals. There the MSM remain.
Look at what the Mail
is now saying for itself:
“Why is the British taxpayer being asked to finance Operation Grange further when all other leads have come to dispiriting dead-ends?”
"But there comes a time in every police inquiry into a disappearance when the question of how long it should continue has to be asked.”
Used - blogger Craig Murray*
So, just as in May 2007, the Mail has slipped from printing fake stories provided by hidden sources down the slope into presenting them to its readers as the truth.
So much for the lost, corrupted and rudderless MSM, which in 2007 were used by people in the McCann camp and in 2018 are being used, once again, to influence people’s opinions, this time by people unknown. Nothing has changed - not because the media are monsters but because the intelligence, expertise and methods of those who've penetrated ("hollowed out") the MSM exceeds that of journalists and editors.
So much for the lost, corrupted and rudderless MSM, which in 2007 were used by people in the McCann camp and in 2018 are being used, once again, to influence people’s opinions, this time by people unknown. Nothing has changed - not because the media are monsters but because the intelligence, expertise and methods of those who've penetrated ("hollowed out") the MSM exceeds that of journalists and editors.
Who Gains?
But who is using them so effectively? These things cost time and
money; we’re not talking pranksters or hobbyists here but funded and professional
operators working for years in the dark world of planted “news”. And what’s in
it for the originators?
They want Grange to end, obviously – they want it dead. They want people to
believe it’s useless. The suspects, they say, are ridiculous. The lines of
investigation go nowhere. And so on. Despite the fact that there’s no evidence at
all that the McCanns themselves are behind this conspiracy the similarities to
the 2007/8 Portuguese investigation are creepily similar: someone is using the same methods to discredit another Madeleine McCann
investigation.
Thus, for example, the MSM in 2007 carried the consistent message that the Portuguese
investigation had failed; that it was junk; that it was led by an untalented
buffoon; that its prime suspects were not the McCanns. And so on.
Someone is frightened that Grange is a success. The only people who could be frightened of that are potential or actual suspects.
__________________________________________________________________________________
STOP PRESS
Maybe the Bureau's writings on this scandal are finally having a result.
For the very first time Clarence Mitchell has moved to distance the McCanns from what has been going on for four years.
“The Met Police have requested extra funding and have been granted it," he tells the tabloids. “It’s not helpful and is very hurtful for retired police officers and in the past so called crime experts and other families to say the investigation should be wound up and is a waste of public money."
Understandably Mitchell has failed to mention that he has been a contributor - not a proven conspirator but an enthusiastic contributor - to nearly all the corrupt packaged stories the Bureau has been writing about, both as a "a source" and as "a pal" or "a friend" and under his own name
We suggested that the conspirators had gone too far with the latest, desperate effort, the Purple Woman junk which took the subversion of Grange to new levels. And they have. And guess who participated in that story -
"It is this ‘woman in purple’, the Mail understands, "who is keeping alive Operation Grange, the marathon reinvestigation of the Madeleine McCann case by Scotland Yard, now in its sixth year.
A source told the Sun : 'There is no evidence they [M/S Purple and Mr Paedophile] were involved [!!] but it would be good to eliminate them from the investigation."
Now who do you think that was?_______________________________________________________________________________
Singing From the Same Sheet
The giant difference from 2007 is the supposed “opposition”
to the hollowed-out MSM: internet
groups. The overwhelming 2007 internet view was that the media were being
conned or had been corrupted and the truth was not
being printed – and they were absolutely right, as Kate McCann, of all people,
has proved with her written confession that the pair had concealed the explosive fact that in August 2007 they were police suspects
- not arguidos but suspects whose home had been raided -
by lying to the media.
But gradually something very weird has happened, as we mentioned in our first piece on the conspiracy: almost all the well-known internet groups now, on FB, twitter and websites, have swung 180 degrees and are in complete agreement with the Mail and the other junk tabloids. Some opposition!
But gradually something very weird has happened, as we mentioned in our first piece on the conspiracy: almost all the well-known internet groups now, on FB, twitter and websites, have swung 180 degrees and are in complete agreement with the Mail and the other junk tabloids. Some opposition!
Look at the twin paths of these supposedly opposed groupings: the Mail and its peers have gone from swallowing the lies offered to it
in May 2007, through believing the clanking, steam-driven PJ publicity “machine”
feeds that the McCanns would be toast by October, to the libel courts, apathy, then "disgraced cop Amaral” land and finally, in 2018, opting to publicise
a conspiracy’s attempts to discredit and kill an investigation into the fate of Madeleine McCann.
The internet “opposition”, following the loss of most of its sane and intelligent commentators years ago, has gone from scepticism about the McCanns, to believing the same PJ “toast” feeds, to crushed disappointment at the archiving and the libel courts, and thence, defeated, on to a journey away from reality into fantasy so deep and deranged – Brownshirt killer squads, switched Madeleines, premeditated murder conspiracies between the McCanns and the ex-head of CEOP and the rest – that it can no be argued with rationally: they are genuinely beyond contact except from fellow sufferers.
The internet “opposition”, following the loss of most of its sane and intelligent commentators years ago, has gone from scepticism about the McCanns, to believing the same PJ “toast” feeds, to crushed disappointment at the archiving and the libel courts, and thence, defeated, on to a journey away from reality into fantasy so deep and deranged – Brownshirt killer squads, switched Madeleines, premeditated murder conspiracies between the McCanns and the ex-head of CEOP and the rest – that it can no be argued with rationally: they are genuinely beyond contact except from fellow sufferers.
They always gained their information chiefly from newspaper stories, not real sources, and our "researchers" are now paying a horrible price for drinking from such poisoned wells: none of them has the slightest idea of who or what to believe anymore, having played at attacking all sources of information indiscriminately and so they've been forced to fall back on the only thing left they trust - their out-of control imaginations which lured them into these quicksands in the first place. Thus defeated they find themselves, like sleepwalkers, parroting the words of the MSM and backing attempts to discredit and kill an investigation into the child's fate.
Used - the latest victim
On Tuesday the Mail, under the heading "Mr Sutton slammed a decision to hand the Met an extra £150,000 for the search", welcomes the hapless Colin Sutton into the latest assault on Grange. Another recruit.
Meanwhile, thank God, the police in both countries appear to
remain on target. Unknown conspirators have made the Bureau even more certain of that. It's not their bullshit that convinces us, though. It's the fact that people with their liberty at risk aren't frightened of buffoonish and failed investigations: they lie awake at night wondering how to deflect the scary ones, those that are on the right track.
_________________________________________________________________________________
*Murray, another hero of the quicksand-bound, doesn't like the Grange funding either.
OK Craig, you've written, "I am going to come straight out with this... in the full knowledge that some decent people will be outraged, here it is."
What are you going to come out with? And what evidence have you got?
We plough through the hearsay and the suspicions and the gossip and the stuff about McCann parenting - come on Craig, everybody says that, what's your inside ambassadorial knowledge that fixes the conspiracy, where's the smoking gun that you suppressed in 2014 and that will outrage decent people?
Ah, got one, a source! Yep, the nutter Anglophobe internet conspiracy theorist Joana Morais, who wasn't there either. Uh-huh. Craig, you're supposed to be supplying people like her with confirmatory evidence, not the other way round. Oh, and a Belgian newspaper "no longer available". Dearie me, we thought you were talking with inside knowledge. Oh well, when you can't quote Tony Blair verbatim, Joana Morais will have to do.
Finally, after hundreds of words of junk gossip we get to what Mr Murray, the insider, knows. Prepare to be outraged, decent people, by his conclusions.
"I do believe [meaning "don't know", our italics] that the McCanns were less than exemplary parents," [that's a state secret, isn't it?] "I believe that New Labour’s No.10 saw, in typical Blair fashion, a highly photogenic tragedy which there might be popularity in appearing to work on.
And I believe there is a genuine danger that the high profile support from the top of the British government might have put some psychological pressure on the Portuguese investigators and prosecuting officers in their determinations [their what?]."
Fucking devastating, isn't it? Murray turns out to be lost in the quicksand himself.
_________________________________________________________________________________
*Murray, another hero of the quicksand-bound, doesn't like the Grange funding either.
OK Craig, you've written, "I am going to come straight out with this... in the full knowledge that some decent people will be outraged, here it is."
What are you going to come out with? And what evidence have you got?
We plough through the hearsay and the suspicions and the gossip and the stuff about McCann parenting - come on Craig, everybody says that, what's your inside ambassadorial knowledge that fixes the conspiracy, where's the smoking gun that you suppressed in 2014 and that will outrage decent people?
Ah, got one, a source! Yep, the nutter Anglophobe internet conspiracy theorist Joana Morais, who wasn't there either. Uh-huh. Craig, you're supposed to be supplying people like her with confirmatory evidence, not the other way round. Oh, and a Belgian newspaper "no longer available". Dearie me, we thought you were talking with inside knowledge. Oh well, when you can't quote Tony Blair verbatim, Joana Morais will have to do.
Finally, after hundreds of words of junk gossip we get to what Mr Murray, the insider, knows. Prepare to be outraged, decent people, by his conclusions.
"I do believe [meaning "don't know", our italics] that the McCanns were less than exemplary parents," [that's a state secret, isn't it?] "I believe that New Labour’s No.10 saw, in typical Blair fashion, a highly photogenic tragedy which there might be popularity in appearing to work on.
And I believe there is a genuine danger that the high profile support from the top of the British government might have put some psychological pressure on the Portuguese investigators and prosecuting officers in their determinations [their what?]."
Fucking devastating, isn't it? Murray turns out to be lost in the quicksand himself.
