“Didn't know whether it was true or not? Anyone with more than a primary education knows that the Holocaust details have been established with certainty… There are no mysteries about its execution, though there are plenty about the human behaviour behind it.
Yet Hall, like Bennett, has fired first and left the known evidence for another time, or rather, again like Bennett, for never, and has put his plug out for an author who claims that the place where my stepfather’s large family was slaughtered, Auschwitz, wasn’t bad at all – why it had a swimming pool and a library for its lucky guests. And Harry’s family couldn’t really have been gassed since there weren’t any gas chambers there.
We’ve tried, unsuccessfully, on the Bureau to shame people into deserting sites like Havern’s ...” – the boring rest is on https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11743-blacksmith-bureau-yet-another-untrue-and-bitter-attack-on-cmomm-tony-benentt-and-richard-d-hall
Outraged (from Norbury) Declaims
Show it to Us (1)
Are you kidding? There isn't any to show. There never was. The buffoon was lying through his teeth. As usual.
You were wrong, Bennett, you fucking compulsive liar. So anxious were you to defend your benighted site and your lunatic friends and associates who think exactly like you and whose "scholarship" is just like your own, that you even lied about responses to the Holocaust itself, you disgusting, morally dead, creature.
Finally: this week the number of Pit posters, according to the site statistics, was at one point exceeded by the number of search-robots. Score: Google robots 2, Bing robot 1, posters 2.
So it seems that the vast majority of the "8000" members may well have shown that they do indeed have a sense of shame and decency and have responded to my repeated appeals to leave your filth-ridden pit and voted with their feet.
Show it To Us (2)
"Amongst all the archival material for the German Third Reich," he writes, "there has always been a notable lack of documentation* to support the existence of an intentional mass-extermination program – of Jews, or anyone else."**
That sentence is itself a definition of Holocaust denial. Leaving aside the asterisked untruths, those words alone are a bullet-proof admission of Holocaust denial by a Holocaust denier. It is the word intentional, i.e. an executed plan by a national government for the annihilation of Europe's Jews, rather than mere pogroms or massacres or "epidemics", that lies at the heart of the Holocaust. Denying the existence of intention denies the Holocaust.
*Lack of documentation:
There has never been a "notable lack of documentation" about the intentionality. Many of the thousands of documents were carefully phrased and guarded and it is these that professional Holocaust deniers like Kollerstrom and his colleagues have concentrated on. Just like Bennett, they select and distort, as well as misunderstand, the evidence. But the key sources expose the truth.
The minutes of the April 16/17 1943 Hitler & Ribbentrop meeting with Hungary’s leader Admiral Horthy, called to speed up the “special treatment” of the 800 000 remaining Jews in that country, are conclusive in revealing the Holocaust intention. Horthy, who was dragging his feet, said openly that “surely he couldn’t beat the Jews to death”, to which foreign minister Ribbentrop replied, with Hitler (who according to the Holocaust deniers knew nothing about it) sitting beside him, that they “must either be annihilated or taken to concentration camps. There is no other way”.